My Work
And why...
Client Space
Photo-Dialogues (linked images)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Search
Resources
  • The Craftsman
    The Craftsman
    by Richard Sennett
  • Juggle! Rethink Work, Reclaim your Life
    Juggle! Rethink Work, Reclaim your Life
    by Ian Sanders
  • Animal Logic
    Animal Logic
    by Richard Barnes
  • About Looking
    About Looking
    by John Berger
  • Dialogue and the Art of Thinking Together: A Pioneering Approach to Communicating in Business and in Life
    Dialogue and the Art of Thinking Together: A Pioneering Approach to Communicating in Business and in Life
    by William Isaacs
  • Changing Conversations in Organizations: A Complexity Approach to Change (Complexity & Emergence in Organizations)
    Changing Conversations in Organizations: A Complexity Approach to Change (Complexity & Emergence in Organizations)
    by Dr Patricia Shaw
  • On Photography
    On Photography
    by Susan Sontag
  • Leadership and the New Science: Discovering Order in a Chaotic World
    Leadership and the New Science: Discovering Order in a Chaotic World
    by Margaret J. Wheatley
  • The Back of the Napkin: Solving Problems and Selling Ideas with Pictures
    The Back of the Napkin: Solving Problems and Selling Ideas with Pictures
    by Dan Roam
  • Photography and Science (Exposures)
    Photography and Science (Exposures)
    by Kelley Wilder
  • Manufactured Landscapes [2006]
    Manufactured Landscapes [2006]
    starring Edward Burtynsky
  • Images of Organization
    Images of Organization
    by Gareth Morgan
« Visualizing dots... | Main | Into the matrix... »
Thursday
May142009

Why dots...?

I really enjoy Jeff Monday's dots...

Compared to personal, improvised portraits, Jeff's representations of complexity through the medium of abstract dots is right at the other end of the representational spectrum.  My process is to disturb our images of self, Jeff's is to remove identity altogether and replace it with a grey dot.  Both might give us new clues about our identity and potential:

In the video Jeff says:

"Yet if we move to a representation of dots, it becomes almost impossible to form any prejudices against the dots; you can only judge that they are round and grey and that there are some dots lower in the organization than others. This is what explains why dots are the perfect way to model complex problems, ideas, and solutions. Because if you can't judge the dot as something that is different from you, it makes it that much easier for you to see yourself, your boss, your employee, your car, your autocompany, your president, your family, your organization, your country in the same situation as the dot or dots..."

It's an excellent way of finding another thread through our experiences.

Reader Comments (6)

Hi Steve

This is an interesting idea and it has got me thinking. I am really not sure that representation and conceptualisation remove beliefs and predjudices. If I see a dot, I automatically transfer my beliefs.

I am still thinking about it :-)

"finding another thread through our experiences" - I love this, Steve.

May 20, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterAnne Marie McEwan

Hi Anne Marie,

This got me thinking too. I think it helps me 'see' my own beliefs and recognise the similarities between us. I don't think it changes beliefs or prejudices but maybe it makes them more transparent?

June 9, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterSteve Marshall

Hi Both
I have to say I was transfixed by the dots, childishly excited and then compelled to write despite a nervousness about writing something stupid. I first noticed the shadow below the dots as an interesting feature - there possibly being more to this dot than just its dottiness. I then was whizzed off into association with snooker balls as the dots rolled about the screen and then the angry green dot reinforced this (3 points - if you have never watched the game!). Snooker balls then made me think of chaos and randomness as no game of snooker has likely to have ever been the same and at the same stroke I thought of energy and enthusiasm as the balls transfer their energy with very little resistance to other balls. I was then excited about the possibilty of using dots in my upcoming development session with my Board and as a group exercise visually ask groups of Board members to represent the Board using dots. I agree that it doesnt remove prejudice as I was thinking what colour dots to use and would black dots stir up imagery of race or hair colour or coloured ones clothes or eyes or moods. However it would be a start and a nice exercise to start conversations from some sort of a level playing fiield. Anyway my head is hurting with dots bashing about in my brain.
Pleasant downloading with you(s)
Gavin

June 11, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterGavin Speers

Hi Gavin,

Great to see you here! The dots do become somehow more real when they cast a shadow...mmm...I guess we all cast a shadow of some sort!

Thinking a bit more about the dots and prejudice - I think that using dots does have some sort of an effect here. My sense is that it helps me to locate the source of the prejudice inside me; and so I own it to a greater extent that if the dots had a face.

I wonder if I can tempt Jeff to comment on this one...

June 12, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterSteve Marshall

Hi all!

What a fascinating discussion. My hope is that by modeling with dots, the dots would remove the prejudice between you and the dot. As you begin to see yourself in the same position as the dot, you should have a meta cognitive interaction and your prejudices should become as Anne Marie said, more transparent. It doesn't always seem to work but sometimes it does.

I am up against an interesting challenge right now with dot colors. Perhaps you can provide some advice: I am reading Joshua Cooper Ramo's book The Age of the Unthinkable and I am trying to build a model on a story he tells of Richard Nisbett's controversial study about how cultural backgrounds influence the way we think. The study tracked students eye movements as they examined pictures and found that the Western trained students focused on subjects in the foreground (example tiger in the forest, western students focused on the tiger) and Eastern trained students focused very little on the subject and focused on the background (forest instead of the tiger).

My goal is to model this finding around one of my favorite sayings "culture eats strategy" Any thoughts on dot color?

Also if you are open to it - I am collaborating with people from around the world on their dot presentations (@ no charge - of course the material and content have to be interesting :) )

June 14, 2009 | Unregistered Commenterjeff monday

Jeff,

Thanks for the link - this sounds a bit like the gestalt perspective on 'figure' and 'ground' - from the vast amount of data in the 'ground' we actively select the 'figure' to which we pay attention. And, as I understand it this is a cultural as well as cognitive preference.

In terms of dot colour...mmm.. what comes to mind is the images that are used in tests for colour blindness. They initially seem like a grey mess (and stay that way, I guess, if you are colour blind) but as you focus on them a clear colour letter or number appears. So, perhaps grey/light pastel becoming stronger/primary as the 'figure' appears?

Hope this helps!

Steve

June 16, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterSteve Marshall

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>